Norwich Council Houses in Goldsmith Street

0

Norwich Council Houses in Goldsmith Street

Financing Financial actors Public funding
Urban Design Environments Quality Liveability Regulación Técnica
Promotion and production Public promotion
Ownership and tenure

Main objectives of the project

Goldsmith Street in Norwich exemplifies a rare phenomenon in the UK: rows of terraced houses constructed directly by the local council, leased with stable tenures at affordable social rents. This collection of 105 homes stands out as an epitome of top-notch architecture, showcasing the utmost environmental and social consciousness. It holds the distinction of being the largest Passivhaus project in the UK.

Date

  • 2019: Ganador
  • 2008: En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Promotor: Norwich Council
  • Architect: Cathy Hawley
  • Architect: Mikhail Riches

Location

Continent: Europe
Country/Region: Norwich, United Kingdom

Description

Goldsmith Street, an innovative development consisting of approximately 100 homes, was constructed by Norwich City Council, bypassing profit-driven developers. These homes epitomize true social housing, leased directly from the council with secure tenancies at fixed rates. Notably, they stand as some of the most energy-efficient residences ever erected in the UK, meeting the rigorous Passivhaus standards from Germany, resulting in a remarkable 70% reduction in fuel expenses for tenants.

Initially, the council had intended to sell the site to a local housing provider, but the plans were thwarted by the financial crisis. In 2012, the city made the bold decision to undertake the development itself, despite not having built homes for decades. Facing challenges, including the loss of around 500 council homes in recent years due to policies transferring public assets into private hands, Norwich navigated financial constraints. Current regulations allow councils to use only 30% of receipts from council home sales through the contentious right-to-buy policy to cover new home costs within a tight three-year timeframe. Nevertheless, Norwich found a solution, employing a combination of borrowing, funds from its housing revenue account, some right-to-buy receipts, and council reserves to proceed with the development independently, without a housing association or development partner.

London-based architects Mikhail Riches and Cathy Hawley won the competition for the site in 2008. Their proposal, distinguishing itself by advocating for streets over blocks of apartment buildings, was inspired by the Golden Triangle buildings, a coveted neighborhood characterized by Victorian terraced houses. This choice demonstrated a lesson in density, challenging planning norms by showcasing the possibility of maintaining humane scaling while accommodating more homes.

Extensive attention to detail is evident throughout the development, from the intricate brick balconies to the cleverly designed interlocking staircases in the three-story flats, ensuring each residence has its own street-facing entrance. Back gardens overlook planted alleys featuring communal tables and benches, while parking is relegated to the site's perimeter, prioritizing pedestrian-friendly streets.

In 2019, the buildings were awarded the prestigious RIBA Stirling Prize. Norwich continues to advocate for innovative approaches to social housing, addressing financial and social constraints to further its endeavors in this regard.

Gent knapt op - Innovative ways to finance housing renovations

0

Gent knapt op - Innovative ways to finance housing renovations

Mismatches Financing Vulnerable groups
Financing Public funding Supply subsidies Progressive financing

Main objectives of the project

“Gent knapt op” was born as the UIA project ICCARus (Improving housing Conditions for CAptive Residents) in Ghent (Belgium). The main goal of the project was to set up a new and innovative way of financing renovation projects of those residents “captive” in low-quality houses. In other words, to help low-income households that cannot foster a renovation, a recurring fund was set up.

Date

  • 2020: En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Constructor: Ghent City Hall

Location

Continent: Europe
Country/Region: Belgium, Ghent

Description

Many people in Ghent are living in low-quality housing units that urgently need renovation. Due to limited budgets, they are stuck in unsafe houses, not energy-efficient and not adapted to people’s physical needs. ‘Caught’ in bad living conditions, they are called ‘captive residents’. Currently, 10.000 households in Ghent are captive residents, which corresponds to 6.000 houses. In this context, the Ghent City Hall faced an urban emergency with little ability to intervene. Many of those captive residents did not fulfill the criteria for renovation grands. So, innovative ways of financing their renovation needed to be found.

Drawing on the Dampoort Knapt Op’ 2015 experience, Ghent set up “Gent knapt op”, with the help of the UIA project ICCARus. The main goal was starting a “recurring fund”. How does this fund work? The project provides for a maximum of 30,000 euros to renovate the house. This fund should be returned. However, the innovation is that it is only returned once the building or the house is sold (or alienated, donated…) to a third party. Once the house is sold, the fund earns the surplus of the selling so they can invest in a new renovation. In this way, the public investment fund can be used over and over again to tackle the low housing quality of vulnerable homeowners.

How is the value to repay calculated? If the value of the house at the moment of repayment is higher than the initial value of the house, plus the value of the contribution adjusted for inflation, then the added value is divided between the owner and the Public Center of Social Welfare. The percentage is based on the ratio between the value of the house before the renovation and the financial contribution. The Public Center of Social Welfare takes a mortgage on the house to ensure that the financial contribution will be paid back.

Apart from the fund, the project also gives guidance to the owners that are in the program. The social and technical help is imperative while renovating the house, so the owners feel secure and heard during the process.

Yes, We Rent! - Leveraging vacant private property to build up a cooperative affordable housing scheme

0

Yes, We Rent! - Leveraging vacant private property to build up a cooperative affordable housing scheme

Policies and regulations Participatory processes
Financing Public funding Indirect opportunities
Promotion and production Innovation Self-management Cooperatives Management and maintenance
Ownership and tenure Shared ownership Rental and temporary tenure Protection of social housing

Main objectives of the project

"Yes, We Rent!" is a social rent scheme in Mataró, Spain, addressing housing shortages and affordability issues. It aims to activate vacant flats for rental, offering below-market rates through guaranteed rents and renovation support. The initiative also trains at-risk teenagers for employment in housing renovation, tackling both housing and socio-economic challenges simultaneously.

Date

  • 2019: En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Constructor: Ajuntament de Mataró

Location

Country/Region: Mataró

Description

The social housing sector in Mataró fails to meet demand, comprising just 265 units while 1400 households remain on the waiting list. Additionally, approximately 3,500 properties sit vacant due to owners lacking renovation resources or fearing unpaid rents. This situation presents both challenges and opportunities. "Yes We Rent!" aims to address this by repurposing these vacant properties to create accessible housing for medium-income households. Through offering guaranteed rent and financial support for renovations, the project incentivizes risk-averse owners to participate in the affordable housing scheme at below-market rates. A portion of the benefits is retained to strengthen and expand the initiative and to employ at-risk youth people in the renovation efforts. Moreover, "Yes We Rent!" explores a multi-stakeholder cooperative model, leveraging public funding and cooperative empowerment to engage tenants in self-help initiatives, service development, and new property recruitment. By harnessing the potential of the social and cooperative sectors, "Yes We Rent!" seeks to redefine roles and relationships in the local rental housing market. The project aims to significantly increase the affordability of rental housing in Mataró by acquiring a substantial number of privately-owned affordable flats—targeting at least 200 units—and offering them at below-market prices to at least 450 individuals in need of housing. This initiative will test a replicable organizational and economic model, with the City Council establishing the scheme and providing initial financing for a mixed multi-stakeholder cooperative that is intended to evolve into a sustainable autonomous entity in the housing market.

Apartment Buildings Hiiu-Suurtüki 4

0

Apartment Buildings Hiiu-Suurtüki 4

Mismatches
Financing
Urban Design
Promotion and production

Main objectives of the project

Hiiu” is an ongoing residential development by OÜ Tardamel located in Tallinn, Estonia.

Date

  • 2013: En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Architect: Indrek Rünkla
  • Architect: Ulla Saar
  • Architect: Sven Koppel
  • Architect: Tarmo Laht
  • Architect: Andres Alver

Location

Continent: Europe
City: Tallinn
Country/Region: Estonia, Tallinn

Description

The complex includes 8,500 m² of residential units – 23 apartments (phase 1 – built) and 10 single-family residences (currently under construction), all integrated into the surrounding landscape of the Tallinn’s picturesque historic garden neighborhood of Nõmme.

The project was defined by its site and the local zoning regulations which restricted the amount of developable space to a maximum of 33 housing units (600 m2 of plot area per unit) with a very low total FAR. Thus, the overall concept of the project became to be “Buildings in the park”.

The apartment houses are put into a relatively dense arrangement on the western side of the site to provide for a more urban/communal atmosphere, in contrast to the rest of the development which is comprised of individual buildings placed discretely into the site. The parking level is located under ground, reducing the bulk of the development and tying the buildings together both under ground and above via a communal public space. Between the apartment houses and the private residences there is a water feature, embellished by a sculpture which provides for a picturesque living environment for the residents.

There were a number of factors that defined the solution for the facade of the apartment complex.
First and foremost, it was the picturesque environment in which the complex was to be placed. The architects wanted to blend the complex into the environment, but to do it in a modern way. Thus, it was decided to go with copper cladding. Given its chemical properties, copper will turn green over time, letting the building age elegantly while slowly blending into its surroundings.

Using copper was also dictated by the will of the architects to merge the roofs and walls of the buildings. In Nõmme, the picturesque historic area of Tallinn, the zoning regulations restrict the maximum bulk of buildings to two floors with a half-floor attic.
While typically this results in a default gable-roof typology, Alver Architects used the restriction as a creative form-generating tool, while using copper to visually merge the walls and the roofs of the buildings. The result is a development which while conforming to the regulations, still boasts a unique character, and generates extra value for the developer.

The stripy texture of the facade of the apartment houses was a solution to the tight budget constraints. As it is cheaper to procure thin stripes of copper rather than large uniform panels or sheets, the facade was composed of thin copper ribbons of different length and width. Once the copper facade was laid out, the windows were placed into it in such a way that they matched the module of the facade, while following the inner logic and insolation requirements of the apartments inside.

Badajoz, Spain

0

Badajoz, Spain

Mismatches
Policies and regulations
Financing
Urban Design
Promotion and production

Main objectives of the project

Date

  • 2023: En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Promotor: Department of Housing and Architecture, Junta de Extremadura

Location

Continent: Europe
City: Badajoz
Country/Region: Badajoz, Spain

Description

This project is an open negotiation between the different parties involved in the development of the city.

The development of the project began with the the commissioning of the first detailed diagnostic study of the whole area which identified the restoration of the Santa Engracia UVA as a priority intervention, so much for its urgency as its viability.

Plan Especial de Reforma Interior (P.E.R.I) establishing the framework for planning the restoration of the district and process of regeneration.

The PERI proporsals for the programme, public, space and building the neighbourhood were organized around eight strategically prioritized lines, which sought to restructure the neighbourhood and recover its relationships.

Strategic lines that link neighbourhood-inhabitants: identity, generational change and accessibility.
Strategic lines in relation to the cultural environment: visibility, recuperation and connection with the city and territory.
Strategic lines in relation to the natural environment: sustainability and landscape.
The project is included in a life fund programme and is currently in development.

Authors:

Marseille, France

0

Europan-MarseilleEuropan-Marseille_2

Marseille, France

Mismatches
Policies and regulations
Urban Design
Promotion and production
Ownership and tenure

Main objectives of the project

Date

  • En proceso

Stakeholders

  • Architect: Concorde
  • Architect: Arki_lab

Location

Continent: Europe
City: Marseille
Country/Region: France, Marseille

Description

This implementation in a bad reputation district of Marseille is the result of a long participative process between the inhabitants, the social landlords, Marseille Rénovation Urbaine, Marseille City Council and the 2 Europan runner-up teams. The project started with the creation of a number of public spaces in anticipation of the transformation of the neighbourhood. The shape of these spaces is not determined by one function only. Playground and sport area are intertwined. These are no longer sports grounds imposing themselves on the city, but parts of the city sometimes used for sport. A walkway runs like a thread through all the areas of the project.

The office Concorde had very clear ideas about accommodation in the zone known as the “Carrñe Sud” which had long been agreed on as an area for housing development. Their idea was bases on a new way of using the land to make housing accessible and to depart from the traditional model of tenand and social landlord. Europan12 Marseille Completed public spaces5 Europan12 Marseille Completed public spaces3

In 2020, the team won the contract to develop the 2.1 hectares site with a team including a developer -a local start-up company interested in giving a more human face to large-scale developments and another architectural office co-opted for his knowledge of low-carbon construction.

In a sector that will eventually include about 130 housing units, the group is to create social housing units, two thirds of which will enjoy a joint land lease arrangement (BRS). A solidarity land office (imagined by the office Concorde) will remain ownership of the land to reduce purchase cost.

This project for a Mediterranean habitat that is both dense and low-rise is currently in progress.

Authors: