Wien, Austria

1

Wien, Austria_1

Wien, Austria

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico
Promoción y producción

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2012: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: ex Studio uek
  • Architect: ARGEbKöb&Pollak + Alexander Schmoeger
  • Architect: goya ZT

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Vienna
País/Región: Austria, Vienna

Breve descripción del proyecto

After the competition, the team engaged in discussions with various stakeholders, including Wien Holding, GESIBA (the housing cooperative), the district head, and the Europan secretary. They refined their ideas and concepts and considered rezoning the area but ultimately decided to make slight adjustments to the urban plan instead. The project was approved to be realized under the Wienese Subsidised Housing framework, leading to the division of the site into three parts and the initiation of another competition called Bauträgerwettbewerb. Studio uek was invited to build one part of the project and contribute to the competition brief. Additional experts were involved to address landscape architecture and participation, resulting in rules and regulations that complemented the existing zoning. The project focused on urban porosity and connecting the housing project with the surrounding area. Two other teams were selected to build the remaining parts, each with their own housing concepts. Studio uek constructed 171 housing units, including sheltered housing and a geriatric day center, and incorporated common spaces and a roof-top route that connects the three parts. The participative activation process allowed residents to define programs for smaller communal spaces and participate in the management of rooftop flowerbeds and gardens. Just after the competition, the team entered in a discussion phase with several actors included Wien Holding, the head of the housing cooperative GESIBA, the head of the district and Europan secretary. They had to sharpen their ideas and their concepts. It was also discussed whether the team should consider rezoning the area but then they decided that through a slight translation of the urban plan without really losing a lot of the qualities, they could avoid this time consuming process. At the end of this first phase it was decided that the project should be realized within the framework of the Wienese Subsidised Housing, which meant that the site should be divided into three smaller parts and thar another competition called Bauträgerwettbewerb should take a place. The team was invited both to build one part of this project and to contribute to elaborate the competition brief. In order to pursue their idea from Europan competition, the team involved additional experts for landscape architecture and for participation and all together they formulated additional rules and regulations for this competition brief, which should complement the existing zoning. These rules concerned the configutation of the whole project, but also the character of the garden courtyard, the rooftop route, several main common spaces in each project part and thar should be included in each project a participative activation process.

Studio uek worked on this specific element of urban porosity, on connecting points between the outside road, the surroundings and the inside world of the housing project. Two Austrian teams were selected to build the two other parts of the area. The first one (ARGE Köb&Pollak / Alexander Schmoeger) on the North side worked on experimental housing providing apartments from a very small size like 30m2 up to big shared apartments. The second team (goya ZT GmbH), in the South part, focused on young and urban housing with a lot of sports and leisure facilities inside the housing project. Studio uek built 171 housing (of which 30 are sheltered housing) + a geriatric day centre. The three built parts have some common spaces dedicated, for some of them, to support the small community of the building and for some other, to offer possibilities to inhabitants of the whole project (like the “play and celebration space” in the studio uek part). A roof-top-route links the three built parts offering also collective spaces (like tenants flowerbeds, glass house, summer kitchen…)

The participative activation process allowed inhabitants to define the programs for smaller common spaces and they were also involved in the management of the flowebeds / garden on the roof.

Autores:

Bilbao, Spain

0

Bilbao.Spain

Bilbao, Spain

Desajustes
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2005: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: Luis Díaz Mauriño
  • Architect: Eduardo Belzunce
  • Architect: Francisco Burgos
  • Architect: Jose María de Lapuerta
  • Architect: Juan García Millán

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Bilbao
País/Región: Bilbao, Spain

Breve descripción del proyecto

The site was a former iron mine, with a topography that had slopes of up to 50 meters, surrounded by a disorganized and degraded residential outskirts to the north and by the channelled Nervión River and the Miraflores peninsula and Miribilla to the south. The frontier character of the site and its ambiguous and hybrid qualities are preserved. A comb-shaped footprint of several towers separated by lookouts works as a visual filter from the urban environment behind, generating a new façade for the city, introducing order and repetition. In addition, is planned a low-rise, introverted, residential core surrounded by a taller permeter dedicated to offices, amenities, retail areas and civic buildings.

The perimeter acts both as a connector to the neighbourhood and the old road to San Sebastian, as well as a visual and acoustic barrier. On the other hand, the existing neighbourhood, which is very dense, needed porosity, so two sun-filled squares with views were preserved with the open spaces between towers acting as urban lookouts. In the core of the cluster, the buildings rise from a carpet of green spaces that act as intermediary spaces.

Six residential buildings spill randomly throughout the hill, almost like a river, without subordinating themselves to parallel alignments, but controlled by a rational geometry. The buildings, following the idea of long-tiered-sigzag, generate a series of exterior voids that get narrower and wider, creating an intermediate scale of communal spaces.

The mixed typology of the buildings combines the volume of the single-family row housing and the functionality of a social housing building with access through corridors. Each unit is accessed from the outside, with independence, provided by its individuality, but stacked one on top of each other, using the collective logic. The longitudinal orientation of the building, approximately north-south, determines that the access corridors, where the entry halls, kitchens, laundry rooms, and bathrooms are facing, need to look north. The south façade, facing the ideal sun conditions and views, is then dedicated to bedrooms and living rooms.
“End and top off the edge of town. It was the responsibility of the proposed architecture to order against confusion”.
“Convert the upper street to a viewer street. The buildings will mark, surprise with different views different from the other side”.
“Project houses to look to the landscape and noon, the park and the streets”.
“It is about Sewing vertically, assigning that role to the own building”.

The result all the premises of the place and the intentions on the project are five residential towers perched on a stepped base (due to the sharp slope) that absorbs all the sector garages which is accessed by a new street below; intermediate semi-public squares looking at the views across the Nervión; all the living rooms facing the midday sun.

Autores:

Groningen, Netherlands

0

Groningen, Netherlands

Groningen, Netherlands

Objetivos principales del proyecto

The 'Super-Shell' housing system offers maximum freedom for personalization. The houses are sold empty, providing only the structure and facades, allowing users to choose the position of installations within the house. This strategy empowers users to become the architects of their own homes, increasing personalization possibilities. The system offers seven different layouts printed on transparent paper, allowing users to combine and choose the most suitable configuration for their lifestyle. A catalog of facade types is also provided to enhance personalization based on light, views, and open-air spaces. The exterior personalization reflects the contrast between individual and collective identity, while avoiding the uniformity of the first modernity housing system. Additionally, a nine-story tower with flexible housing typology, including apartments for people with disabilities, was added to the project, along with new public spaces.

Fecha

  • 2012: Rehabilitación

Agentes

  • Architect: Casanova+Hernández architects

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Groningen
País/Región: Groningen, Netherlands

Breve descripción del proyecto

The ‘Super-Shell’ houses system provides the user maximum level of freedom to personalize his house. The house is sold completely empty, offering only the structure and the facades, without any installations or rooms inside. Three strategically holes located in the floors allow the user to choose the position of the installations within the house after bying it. In this project several strategies have been applied to allow the personalization of the houses:

By choosing this strategy, the house is thought and designed by the user under certain frame conditions. The user becomes the architect of his house in the same way he is becoming nowadays the architect of his own life.

The possibility of placing kitchen, toilets and bathrooms in very different positions, combined with the flexibility of choosing the position for the rest of the rooms, increases enormously the number of possible layouts of the house and its level of personalization.

Another strategy tested in this project to offer a wide range of possibilities to personalize the houses, has been to provide seven different layouts of ground floors, first floors and second ones printed on transparent paper. The user has been able to combine the transparent papers to decide which layout suits better his way of living.
In total 343 layouts are possible with this system.

A catalogue of different façade types has also been provided to personalize further the house in order to satisfy the interior necessities of light, views and possible open air spaces.

On the one hand the personalization of the exterior of the house reinforces the contrast between individual and collective identity and reflects the social conflict between individualization and society. On the other hand the personalization of the house avoids the typical result of the housing system of the first modernity according to which every family had the same identical dwelling with the same appearance.

The nine-storey tower added during the development process, contains 16 apartments for people with disabilities +25 apartments, with a super-flexible housing typology and with some new public spaces.

Autores:

Mulhouse, France

0

Mulhouse, France

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Toa Architects, victorious in the Europan 3 competition, secured a contract to design a youth hostel funded by Mulhouse Habitat and the PUCA. The "experimental project" prioritized architectural flexibility, creating a transformative space that seamlessly transitions from private to communal areas, promoting resident autonomy and social interaction.

Fecha

  • 2003: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: TOA architectes

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Mulhouse
País/Región: France, Mulhouse

Breve descripción del proyecto

After the Europan 3 competition, the winning team Toa architects get a contract for a young workers hostel, financed by Mulhouse Habitat and the PUCA (Urban Planning, Architecture and Construction) with 82 bedrooms, common areas and public facilities.

The “experimental project” label and the great involvement of the client allowed architectural dispensations and the possible interpretation by the team of the rules in order to create a mixed space where uses would have the ability to modify relationships between people.

The architecture operates like a filter, expressing the gradual movement from privacy to sociability, at both individual and group scale. Two buildings are positioned parallel to the street: the first, lower building, accommodates the communal spaces that are open to the districts, together with the spaces representing the institution; the second, three-storey building, is set back, and contains the living areas and communal spaces associated with the residential function. A basement level garden organises the relation between the two buildings and offers an intimacy space, protector, more private.

The centre is designed to give the resident’s choice, the meeting or avoidance, balance between independence and communal living: choice in the residential access routes to the living spaces, choice to live at home or to enjoy sociability spaces, choice in the housing interior of several configurations through the interplay of dual-position swing doors.

The housing units also reflect the variety of demand, ranging in type from maximum autonomy to maximum communality. All aimed at favouring random meetings, internal evolution, the passage from solitude, to life as two, as, couple, a family with children: “maisonnette”, single rooms, paired rooms, adaptable rooms for couples or single-parent families, shared apartments for four residents.

Autores:

IQ innerstädtische Wohnquartiere

0

Europan-Selb

IQ innerstädtische Wohnquartiere

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Financiaciones
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico
Promoción y producción

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2016: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: TallerDE2
  • Architect: Gutiérrez-delaFuente

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Selb
País/Región: Germany

Breve descripción del proyecto

1st Prize Implementation: IQ Experimental Subsidized Housing in Selb (IQ innerstädtische Wohnquartiere) is a state-subsidized program included in an experimental regional initiative from the Bavarian Ministry of Construction to revitalize the central areas of a group of selected cities in Bavaria, Germany. The construction of the IQ Housing Project is the result of the 1st Prize won in the Invited International Competition «IQ Innerstädtische Wohnquartiere».

Urban regeneration: this new input from the regional government of Bavaria fits perfectly and is smoothly integrated in the Europan 9 open-process of urban regeneration for the iiner city of Selb. The IQ Project followa the main principles of the Preventive Urban Acupuncture Therapy started in 2008: it´s focused in the revitalization of the inner city, is an architecture intervention with a strong urban impact (connecting two different levels of the city), and is oriented to young families, completing the Europan 9 demographic-oriented projects for babies, children, teenagers and young people.
Revisiting the everyday life: the residential program is composed of 26 apartments for young families, with parking lots, cellars, and a district heating biomass power plant. The urban layout is an answer to the local climate in order to establish democratic sunlight conditions, giving also, the same cross-ventilation features to all. The sun is the dominant vector in the project. The blocks are artitulated with a type of half-open hallways, with permeable facades, working as thermal regulators and providing the first shared space for the community. The apartments are designed around an outdoor and covered loggia, a green-room which is always oriented to the sun. The housing units are organized with a strip of services and installations, which frees the rest of areas making possible many settings throughout the time.

Autores:

Trondheim, Norway

0

Europan_trondheim

Trondheim, Norway

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Promoción y producción

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2022: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: Murado & Elvira Architecture

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Trondheim
País/Región: Norway, Trondheim

Breve descripción del proyecto

Teknobyen – Student housing in Throndheim (NO) The project unifies situations of extreme intimacy with those of extroversion and collaboration. A room is a powerful mechanism that allows the expansion of the identity, self-recognition and reaffirmation, interchange and negotiation. One’s own space is a laboratory where to test abilities that later will be experienced in every act of social interaction. Teknobyen student’s housing proposes the compression, transfer and conditioning of the relational capacities of urban space. It understands the program of necessities as a powerful design tool and key factor to improve the way we live and relate to each other.

Assuming the existing urban conditions, the student housing detaches as much as possible from the surrounding buildings and shapes its volume in order to extract potential from the views and sun. Open-air terraces are spread around the building. Through them, students can experience ourside conditions and relate with the city and the far views.

The core of the building contains a multipurpose lounge with no hierarchy, or spatial definition, in which different ambiances are located. It is a mixed-use two-story hyperlounge an unregulated mixing chamber of possible actions. Room floors surround this lounge.

Students share this flexible lounge and a self managed ‘ultrakitchen’, and experimental space conceived for the use and enjoyment of 116 students at the same time, a 24/7 sort of social sustainability condenser. In order to stress a local initiative that intends to promote Trondheim as a wood-friendly city, and also seeking new challenges about wood use in large buildings, the entire exterior volume of the buildings is cladded with fir (pine) wooden planks, displaying different treatments, compositions and layouts.

Thus, the building assumes a very tight budget, neglecting the use of sopbhisticated material solutions and embracing common and traditional technology, but applying in a contemporary way. Although it is technically modest, it is performatively ambitious.

Sustainability Co-Responsibility devices are implemented in order to share the energetic and waste management.

Instead of ans isolated and self-referential object, the result is an unassuming building that sets a dialogue with the city and its codes, focusing on the creation of a collective experience and in a sense of social responsibility.

The building has been nominated to the Norwegian National Building Prizxe in 2012 and has won the Trondheim Kommune Energy Saving Prize.

Autores:

Wien, Austria

0

Europan-WienEuropan-Wien_2

Wien, Austria

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico
Promoción y producción

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2022: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: Arenas Basabe Palacios arquitectos

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Vienna
País/Región:

Breve descripción del proyecto

The process has been a collective effort based on negotiation, in collaboration with the local architectural team, Mascha & Seethaler, management experts (Raum&Co), mobility (Traffix), landscaping (Land in Sicht), energy or sociology, as well as representatives of the neighborhood, the soil promoters (ARE) and the MA21 office of the Vienna City Council; all of them active participants in the design process. The team published the story of this collaborative process as a comic (“Commons”), from the winning project of the Europan 10 competition in Vienna and its later development with a multidisciplinary team until its definitive passing by the Vienna City Council. “Commons” obtained recognition as an example of innovative, sustainable and democratic urbanism.

One of the most challenging issues of today is the question whether housing in itself, as a programme, has the power to generate an urban neighbouthood. “Garden>Courtyard” plays the ball straight back to the municipality, developers and users, suggesting an extrapolated concept of mixing with just a single programme-housing: housing with diverse models of living, diverse models of sharing, diverse models of developing, diverse models of financing, diverse models of landscaping, diverse models of maintaining.

Once the masterplan approved, the landowner (ARE, Austrian Real State) commissioned multiple architecture teams as well as different sporsors to develop an edification design. In the partnership with the Viennese enterprise for social housing and different cooperatives, a collaborative democratic and plural urbanism process was created. Arenas Basabe Palacios was commissioned with the design and execution of 11 housing blocks in different scales, including 82 housing units with a total of 9500 m2 constructed surface containing community spaces, shared parking facilities for bicycles and commercial spaces in the ground floor for zone.

The design respects the original urban idea and furthermore creates new potential based on the garden-matrix, which is structuring the new district. Each block is constructed around its garden while edification varies in height, bay and edification type: constructions of small scale (size S) contain single-family housing and duplex; Medium-scaled buildings (size M) as their taller complements (size L) serve as collective housing blocks and develop a diverse and porous urban process.

The materiality of the buildings accentuates this idea: Ceramic colour facades are facing the sun, while all living spaces are south-orientated and opened towards the garden. The more intimate bedrooms can be accessed through privacy filters in form of halls which contain service rooms installations and space for storage.

The dwelling´s interiors reflect the characteristic construction system: together with white carpentry, visible vertically perforated bricks (“Hochlochziegel”) are creating a sequence of neutral, flexible and reconfigurable spaces.

Autores:

Marseille, France

0

Europan-MarseilleEuropan-Marseille_2

Marseille, France

Desajustes
Políticas y regulaciones
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico
Promoción y producción
Propiedad y tenencia

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • En proceso

Agentes

  • Architect: Concorde
  • Architect: Arki_lab

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Marseille
País/Región: France, Marseille

Breve descripción del proyecto

This implementation in a bad reputation district of Marseille is the result of a long participative process between the inhabitants, the social landlords, Marseille Rénovation Urbaine, Marseille City Council and the 2 Europan runner-up teams. The project started with the creation of a number of public spaces in anticipation of the transformation of the neighbourhood. The shape of these spaces is not determined by one function only. Playground and sport area are intertwined. These are no longer sports grounds imposing themselves on the city, but parts of the city sometimes used for sport. A walkway runs like a thread through all the areas of the project.

The office Concorde had very clear ideas about accommodation in the zone known as the “Carrñe Sud” which had long been agreed on as an area for housing development. Their idea was bases on a new way of using the land to make housing accessible and to depart from the traditional model of tenand and social landlord. Europan12 Marseille Completed public spaces5 Europan12 Marseille Completed public spaces3

In 2020, the team won the contract to develop the 2.1 hectares site with a team including a developer -a local start-up company interested in giving a more human face to large-scale developments and another architectural office co-opted for his knowledge of low-carbon construction.

In a sector that will eventually include about 130 housing units, the group is to create social housing units, two thirds of which will enjoy a joint land lease arrangement (BRS). A solidarity land office (imagined by the office Concorde) will remain ownership of the land to reduce purchase cost.

This project for a Mediterranean habitat that is both dense and low-rise is currently in progress.

Autores:

Zaanstad, Netherlands 

0

Zaanstad

Zaanstad, Netherlands 

Desajustes
Diseño urbano y arquitectónico
Promoción y producción

Objetivos principales del proyecto

Fecha

  • 2000: Construction

Agentes

  • Architect: Tania Concko
  • Architect: Pierre Gautier

Localización

Continente: Europe
Ciudad: Amsterdam
País/Región: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Breve descripción del proyecto

In this project the characteristic and qualities of the site and the memories of an industrial past –the river Zaan was the chief arterial route– have been take as the guiding principle in the design. The assignment comprised three major elements: in the first place the residential function of the site had to be reinforced; in the second place the relationship between the site and the adjacent residential areas required intensification and finally an open green space had to be created along the Zaan. The architects restored the original zoning of the site into separate plots. The plots are separated from each other and from the waterside- the Oostzijde- by water. They are conceived as islands. The separate plots and platforms are framed by a structure of boardwalks which form the open space on the scale of the town. It is a promenade, running along the Zann open to everyone and keeps the memory of the maritime past of the site alive. Tania Concko and Pierre Gautier designed the masterplan of the whole area. It served as document on the basic of which the 3 teams of architects involved in the design, can develop the residential blocks and it defined the architectural brief. In the housing the idea of spaciousness is created through the use of vacant space. So a flexible and differentiated use of the housing is possible. Another characteristic feature for is its double orientation as well as a transition zone between along the façade which can function as a balcony, sun lounge, winter garden or as an extension of the housing unit.

Tania Concko and Pierre Gautier had to supervise the architectural elaborations and they had to design four buildings (2 high blocks along the Zaan and 2 low blocs along the Oostzijde), the platforms with car park and the collective and public exterior spaces.

55 affordable housing units using prefabricated construction systems

45 housing units combining home-working, starters, social & private homes in an hybrid urban block.

Autores: